In 2008, a New York woman feared her brother, a troubled young Muslim man living in New York, might be getting involved in a violent radical group in Pakistan. So she called a cleric in Houston for advice. The cleric in turn called Mohamed Elibiary, head of the Plano-based nonprofit Freedom and Justice Foundation.
Elibiary, who has quietly emerged as the country’s leading Muslim deradicalization expert, devised an intervention that played on the young man’s familial duties and got him to return to the United States where counselors and mentors steered him away from militant extremism.
That case is detailed in a new report from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a think tank that has compiled stories of other would-be terrorists who abandoned their violent plans.
And it’s a reminder that in the aftermath of last year’s Fort Hood shootings and the recent terrorism-related arrests of young Muslim Americans, we need people like Elibiary working with government and law enforcement.
Before we delve into the problem of Muslim radicalism, though, let’s be clear about something: This isn’t an exclusively Muslim problem. The path to violent extremism can originate anywhere — in a church, on a military base, in a cabin in the woods.
We’ve seen Christian radicalization (the anti-abortion activist Scott Roeder who killed a Kansas doctor — in a church, no less) and the secular variety (anti-government murderer Tim McVeigh).
And as I hear experts talk about the allure of radicalism among disaffected young Muslims, I can’t help but think of my own youthful attraction to a revolutionary cause. Growing up Irish Catholic, I held a romanticized vision of the Irish Republican Army. They were Catholic heroes attempting to overthrow Northern Ireland’s Protestant British oppressors. Never mind that their guerilla tactics included blowing up civilians in night clubs or using kneecapping to punish and intimidate their own people.
A noble cause can be especially intoxicating to young people who do not appreciate the cost of violence.
Over the past year, militant groups such as al-Shabab and the Taliban have attracted young men from the United States with the idea that they should take up arms on behalf of their fellow Muslims even if that means becoming a suicide bomber or fighting against the United States in Afghanistan.
Elibiary said experts are calling this wave of extremism “jihadi cool.” Some of these young recruits, he said, have a proclivity toward violence and a shallow understanding of Islam. Some are naive children of immigrants with bright futures who get swept up by their desire to defend civilians overseas.
“They’re kind of idealists who don’t understand that geopolitics is all about interests and power dynamics,” he said.
This fervor can grip others, too. Maj. Nidal Hasan, the Army psychiatrist accused in the shooting rampage at Fort Hood that killed 13 and wounded many others, reportedly had ties to a radical imam in Yemen.
As alarming as these cases are, the violent extremists who have emerged from American Muslim communities represent a tiny minority among the millions of Muslims living and working peacefully in the United States, according to a report released last month by researchers at Duke University and University of North Carolina.
The report found that Muslim communities have helped stem radicalization by reporting potential violent extremists, publicly and privately denouncing terrorism and building strong social networks.
But these extremists are an enormous concern to Muslims still struggling to restore their reputation almost a decade after 9/11.
Here in Austin, leaders aren’t afraid to address the threat of radicalism. There’s been talk of organizing a conference on the topic. And Amanda Quraishi, founder of the nonprofit Central Texas Muslimaat, said she would like to see Muslims team up with professionals who have successfully worked with violent youths, such as street gangs.
The challenge, experts say, is that radicalization often takes place in Internet chat rooms, away from the watchful eyes of community leaders.
So what can a Muslim leader do? How do you spot someone who may have terrorist ambitions?
Sheik Mohamed-Umer Esmail, a former Austin imam now living in Canada, said he takes notice when an individual suddenly becomes intensely religious.
“I try to as politely as possible inquire about his motivation and what sources he refers to for his guidance,” Esmail said. “Then I give him advice on the importance of moderation and how easily one can be misled through the Internet.”
He urges people to channel their anger over the wars or U.S. foreign policy through nonviolent civic engagement.
Imam Islam Mossaad of the North Austin Muslim Community Center stressed the importance of providing relevant sermons that acknowledge the injustices of the world but don’t encourage a violent response.
“Imagine a young person who is fully aware of — and sometimes directly affected by tyranny — going to the mosque and waiting from some guidance from the appointed imam about current realities, and all he hears is a pre-packaged sermon that lacks any courage or true insight,” Mossaad said. “Such disappointed youths may become disaffected and will gravitate elsewhere.”
Elibiary said mainstream Muslim communities can’t realistically counter violent extremism simply by setting a “moderate” example. But, he said, “What the mainstream Muslim community-based groups … can do is strengthen family-based programs, so that the marketplace of potentially vulnerable at-risk youth who could be pulled by a recruiter’s message would shrink and therefore limit the growth of the violent extremism movement.”
Eileen Flynn blogs at eileenflynn.wordpress.com

Last Tuesday, Directors of the CIA, FBI and National Intelligence declared that an attack by Al Qaeda in the next 3 to 6 months “is certain!” Leon Panetta, CIA Director announced, “The biggest threat is not so much that we face an attack like 9/11. It is that Al Qaeda is adapting its methods in ways that oftentimes make it difficult to detect.”
Panetta’s statement does not take into account the ability to identify any terrorist whose goal it is to give up their life for a cause. Only when you are observing measurable emerging aggression can you identify a terrorist before they effect their violence.
The Center for Aggression Management discovered 15 years ago that there were two kinds of aggression: adrenaline-driven Primal Aggression and intent-driven Cognitive Aggression. The Primal Aggressor, in the extreme, is “red-faced and ready to explode,” the Cognitive Aggressor (the terrorist) is not. When a person, regardless of the culture, gender, education or position, rises to the level where their goal is to give up their life for a cause, their body looses animation and we see the “thousand-yard stare.” But it is more than this, the whole body and behavior looses animation and this is how we can identify them. The problem is that security and law enforcement are still looking for the Primal Aggressor (red-faced and ready to explode). Of course they are finding it difficult to detect these terrorist; a terrorist is a Cognitive Aggression; they are looking for the wrong person!
As our Government analyzes what went wrong regarding Abdulmatallab’s entrance into the United States, you can be assured that Al Qaeda is also analyzing how their plans went wrong. Who do you think will figure it out first . . . ?
You can read more at http://blog.AggressionManagement.com