Caught! Facebook admits running anti-Google campaign
Social network admits to hiring PR firm to pitch stories about Google’s privacy practices
Both Facebook and the PR firm, Burson-Marsteller, admitted Thursday to trying to get journalists and bloggers to write negative articles about Google‘s privacy practices. The move comes as competition between Facebook and Google has accelerated over the past several months.
The Internet was abuzz with the news that Facebook undertook what many industry analysts and commentators are calling a surreptitious smear campaign against one of its competitors.
“When companies get big enough and grow really quickly … you start to get these rather bizarre political marketing ploys,” said Hadley Reynolds, an analyst with IDC. “It certainly isn’t serving Facebook or the industry or Burson-Marsteller well, in this case. The power of social media exposes these shenanigans.”
- Caught! Facebook admits running anti-Google campaign
- Facebook helps tornado victims find lost items
- Facebook looks to hire 9,400 by 2017
- For women, Facebook can turn friends into frenemies
- Facebook goes head-to-head with Groupon
- Salesforce.com deepens tie-in to Facebook
- Duo scrapes 1M Facebook profiles to create mock ‘dating’ site
- Facebook raises $1.5B, at valuation of $50B
- Facebook cuts developer access to user numbers, addresses
- Facebook joins hunt for missing kids with Amber Alerts
In an email to Computerworld, Facebook denied running a smear campaign.
“No ‘smear’ campaign was authorized or intended,” a Facebook spokesman wrote. “Instead, we wanted third parties to verify that people did not approve of the collection and use of information from their accounts on Facebook and other services for inclusion in Google Social Circles — just as Facebook did not approve of use or collection for this purpose. We engaged Burson-Marsteller to focus attention on this issue, using publicly available information that could be independently verified by any media organization or analyst.”
The spokesman added that the issues are serious ones that should have been presented in “a serious and transparent way.”
However, questions arise about a smear campaign because Facebook had allegedly told Burson-Marsteller to keep the company’s name out of it. When asked about that, Facebook did not respond.
The entire issue came to light when PR people from Burson-Marsteller contacted blogger Christopher Soghoian, proposing that he write a piece on Google’s privacy practices and Google Social Circles in particular.
Social Circles is a feature in Google Dashboard that pulls together a user’s publicly available content from social networking sites, such as Facebook and Twitter, and adds it into the user’s search results.
Soghoian, in response, published the string of emails with Burson-Marsteller about the matter.
Adding fuel to the fire, Burson-Marsteller pitched the same story to USA Today, which ran its own story about the “whisper campaign” to get news media outlets to publish anti-Google pieces.
However, The Daily Beast followed the trail back to Facebook, where executives at the social network admitted to hiring the PR firm to put out the information on Google.
Google has not commented on the situation.
For its part, Burson-Marsteller took some blame for the situation.
“The client requested that its name be withheld on the grounds that it was merely asking to bring publicly available information to light …,” a spokesman for Burson-Marsteller said in an email. “Whatever the rationale, this was not at all standard operating procedure and is against our policies, and the assignment on those terms should have been declined. When talking to the media, we need to adhere to strict standards of transparency about clients, and this incident underscores the absolute importance of that principle.”
Sharon Gaudin covers the Internet and Web 2.0, emerging technologies, and desktop and laptop chips for Computerworld. Follow Sharon on Twitter at @sgaudin or subscribe to Sharon’s RSS feed . Her e-mail address is email@example.com.